Skip to content
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

CalypsoAI Attack Campaigns: Comprehensive Technical Overview with GenAI Red Teaming Context

Introduction

Generative AI systems, especially Large Language Models (LLMs), have transformed the technology landscape—but with this power comes a new set of security risks. CalypsoAI’s Attack Campaigns dashboard is engineered for security professionals to simulate, manage, and analyze adversarial attacks on AI models and their supporting infrastructure. This platform integrates best practices from GenAI Red Teaming, providing robust, continuous, and risk-based assessments to uncover vulnerabilities before bad actors do.

The Role of GenAI Red Teaming

GenAI Red Teaming extends beyond classic cybersecurity red teaming by focusing on both the technical and content-driven risks unique to generative models. This includes:

  • Adversarial Testing: Intentionally probing for vulnerabilities like prompt injection, model extraction, bias, privacy leaks, and hallucinations.
  • Dual Perspective: Evaluating threats from both adversarial and end-user viewpoints.
  • Lifecycle Integration: Red teaming isn’t a one-off—it’s iterative, spanning model acquisition, training, deployment, and ongoing operations.
  • Regulatory Alignment: Increasingly required by regulations and industry standards, with emphasis on continuous, risk-driven evaluation.

Attack Campaign Types

Standard Attacks

Single-turn, predefined adversarial prompts designed to expose fundamental weaknesses such as:

  • Prompt Injection: Inputs crafted to manipulate model behavior or bypass intended controls.
  • Jailbreaking: Attempts to circumvent safety guardrails, either directly or by gradual context-shifting.
  • Toxic Output Generation: Prompts that elicit harmful, biased, or inappropriate responses.

Agentic Warfare

Simulates persistent, adaptive adversaries using multi-turn, context-aware strategies. Attackers:

  • Probe for inconsistent refusals and policy enforcement gaps.
  • Chain prompts to escalate privileges or extract sensitive data.
  • Use trial-and-error to find and exploit model blind spots.

Example Tactics:

  • FRAME: Reframes malicious requests as beneficial or innocuous.
  • Trolley: Forces ethical dilemmas to test the model’s safety boundaries.

Signature Attacks

Curated, regularly updated collections of adversarial prompts reflecting the latest threat intelligence, including:

  • Jailbreak scripts.
  • Social engineering attacks.
  • Newly observed adversarial trends.

Operational Attacks

Target the infrastructure supporting AI, such as:

  • Denial-of-Service (DoS) Simulations: Overwhelm endpoints to test system resilience.
  • Resource Exhaustion: Send computationally intensive or malformed inputs to stress-test the backend.

Attack Vectors and Payload Converters

Attackers leverage encoding and obfuscation to evade detection. CalypsoAI provides:

  • Base64 Converter: Encodes payloads to bypass basic filters.
  • Leetspeak Converter: Substitutes characters to evade pattern matching.
  • Unicode Confusable Converter: Uses visually similar Unicode characters to obfuscate malicious input.
  • Caesar Cipher Converter: Applies letter shifts to hide intent.
  • Repeat Token/Single Character Tools: Exploits tokenization quirks to slip past detection.

These tools simulate real-world evasion tactics, helping teams test the robustness of their defenses.

Advanced Adversarial Techniques

Fictional and Conditional Context Change

Attackers may frame prompts as hypothetical or fictional scenarios to relax safety constraints, or dynamically adjust context based on model responses.

Payload Splitting

Divides malicious content across multiple prompts or fields, evading filters that only scan for complete payloads.

Refusal Suppression

Crafts prompts to minimize the likelihood of model refusals, using indirect language, complex instructions, or ambiguity.

Scenario Nesting

Layers unsafe requests within complex, multi-part scenarios or role-plays, obscuring malicious intent.

Single-Turn Crescendo

Gradually escalates the maliciousness within a single prompt, starting innocuously and building toward the attack.

Persuasive Adversarial Prompts

Applies social engineering—urgency, authority, or empathy—to coax the model into unsafe behavior.

DAN (Do Anything Now)

Attempts to override model safeguards by simulating alternate personas or operational modes.

Key Vulnerabilities Addressed

CalypsoAI’s approach, informed by GenAI Red Teaming, targets a broad spectrum of risks:

  • Prompt Injection and Jailbreaking
  • Toxic and Biased Outputs
  • Implicit Persona and Cultural Bias
  • Knowledge Risks & Hallucinations
  • PII and Data Leakage
  • Copyright and IP Violations
  • Model Extraction
  • Supply Chain and Dependency Risks
  • Technical Harm Vectors (e.g., code exploits, attack script generation)

Red Teaming Lifecycle and Process

Red teaming is integrated across the AI model lifecycle:

  1. Scoping and Targeting: Define risk-based priorities.
  2. Resource Preparation: Develop datasets, tools, and attack libraries.
  3. Execution: Conduct campaigns, including multi-attempt testing for stochastic outputs.
  4. Reporting and Debrief: Analyze findings, update reports, and inform remediation.
  5. Retesting: Validate fixes and track progress over time.

This iterative process ensures consistent improvement and regression tracking.

Metrics and Evaluation

  • Attack Success Rate (ASR): Percentage of adversarial inputs that successfully exploit vulnerabilities.
  • Detection Rate: Proportion of attacks flagged by defenses.
  • Knowledge and Reasoning Metrics: Factuality, coherence, comprehensiveness, and more.
  • Fairness Metrics: Bias, representation, and capability fairness.
  • Operational Monitoring: Tracks user activity, session patterns, and token usage to detect anomalies.

Best Practices and Recommendations

  • Shift Left: Integrate red teaming early in development.
  • Continuous Assessment: Make red teaming a recurring activity, not a one-off.
  • Contextual Testing: Consider regional, cultural, and domain-specific nuances.
  • Robust Monitoring: Watch for suspicious activity and prompt injection attempts.
  • Comprehensive Evaluation: Test both model vulnerabilities and capabilities.

Conclusion

CalypsoAI Attack Campaigns, grounded in the latest GenAI Red Teaming methodologies, offers security teams a powerful, technically rigorous environment for adversarial testing. By simulating the tactics of real-world attackers—from prompt engineering and evasion to infrastructure-level assaults—organizations can proactively secure their AI deployments, meet regulatory mandates, and build trust in their generative AI systems.